←back to thread

LLMs can get "brain rot"

(llm-brain-rot.github.io)
466 points tamnd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
avazhi ◴[] No.45658886[source]
“Studying “Brain Rot” for LLMs isn’t just a catchy metaphor—it reframes data curation as cognitive hygiene for AI, guiding how we source, filter, and maintain training corpora so deployed systems stay sharp, reliable, and aligned over time.”

An LLM-written line if I’ve ever seen one. Looks like the authors have their own brainrot to contend with.

replies(12): >>45658899 #>>45660532 #>>45661492 #>>45662138 #>>45662241 #>>45664417 #>>45664474 #>>45665028 #>>45668042 #>>45670485 #>>45670910 #>>45671621 #
standardly ◴[] No.45660532[source]
That is indeed an LLM-written sentence — not only does it employ an em dash, but also lists objects in a series — twice within the same sentence — typical LLM behavior that renders its output conspicuous, obvious, and readily apparent to HN readers.
replies(15): >>45660603 #>>45660625 #>>45660648 #>>45660736 #>>45660769 #>>45660781 #>>45660816 #>>45662051 #>>45664698 #>>45665777 #>>45666311 #>>45667269 #>>45670534 #>>45678811 #>>45687737 #
turtletontine ◴[] No.45660736[source]
I think this article has already made the rounds here, but I still think about it. I love using em dashes! It really makes me sad that I need to avoid them now to sound human

https://bassi.li/articles/i-miss-using-em-dashes

replies(13): >>45660868 #>>45661962 #>>45663044 #>>45663414 #>>45663533 #>>45663715 #>>45664775 #>>45665728 #>>45665739 #>>45665745 #>>45665925 #>>45667267 #>>45667708 #
jader201 ◴[] No.45661962[source]
Same here. I recently learned it was an LLM thing, and I've been using them forever.

Also relevant: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45226150

replies(2): >>45663703 #>>45665104 #
tkgally ◴[] No.45663703[source]
> I’ve been using them forever.

Many other HN contributors have, too. Here’s the pre-ChatGPT em dash leaderboard:

https://www.gally.net/miscellaneous/hn-em-dash-user-leaderbo...

replies(4): >>45664116 #>>45665032 #>>45665076 #>>45667303 #
1. Ericson2314 ◴[] No.45665032{3}[source]
Can anyone make it go beyond 200? I feel like I deserve to be somewhere in there — at least I would be sad if I didn't make top 1000!