←back to thread

404 points voxleone | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
bahmboo ◴[] No.45660320[source]
"The president and I want to get to the moon in this president's term" - Sean Duffy NASA administrator.

A scary way to set a schedule on a complex project with lives at stake. They don't care though.

replies(23): >>45660416 #>>45660527 #>>45660821 #>>45660902 #>>45660920 #>>45660957 #>>45661025 #>>45661086 #>>45661197 #>>45661359 #>>45661924 #>>45662101 #>>45662301 #>>45663008 #>>45663548 #>>45663848 #>>45663936 #>>45664547 #>>45665860 #>>45666795 #>>45667744 #>>45670520 #>>45686581 #
WalterBright ◴[] No.45660416[source]
Having a deadline is how things get done. With no deadline, nothing gets accomplished.
replies(6): >>45660444 #>>45660462 #>>45660483 #>>45660550 #>>45660916 #>>45661152 #
dragontamer ◴[] No.45660550[source]
The Moon directive was set by Donald Trump in 2017.

This is just the same deadline being pushed another year because of failures. Deadlines that get constantly pushed aren't deadlines at all.

As I recall, SpaceX and Artemis project was supposed to be Moon by 2024. At least originally. But then SpaceX blew up all the rockets (successfully testing them or something) and now we've wasted damn near a decade.

replies(2): >>45660716 #>>45660875 #
jaapbadlands ◴[] No.45660716[source]
Testing rockets that fail is still progress. Deadlines that get pushed isn't an argument against deadlines.
replies(1): >>45663945 #
1. dragontamer ◴[] No.45663945[source]
Deadlines that get pushed is an argument against SpaceX. How many deadlines do we miss before we realize there is no actual plan to get to the moon?