←back to thread

ChatGPT Atlas

(chatgpt.com)
763 points easton | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mentalgear ◴[] No.45658540[source]
So openAI's answer to Perplexity's Comet. I'm afraid this will be the future, as these AI-browsers do truly bring value. But they open up the gate for a single Big Tech Winner that truly knows everything about you, and can even control everything on your behalf.

I really hope open-source Browsers like Firefox follow up soon with better alternatives, like on-device LLMs to counteract the "all in the cloud" LLM approach. Of course that would require top-tier ML engineers who mostly all are pay-captured by Big Tech.

replies(19): >>45658598 #>>45658665 #>>45658669 #>>45658680 #>>45658685 #>>45658708 #>>45658717 #>>45658772 #>>45658829 #>>45659379 #>>45659511 #>>45659695 #>>45659886 #>>45660214 #>>45660654 #>>45667045 #>>45667399 #>>45668147 #>>45668281 #
bogwog ◴[] No.45658665[source]
What value? I haven't used them myself, but from reviews I've seen on Youtube they appear to be flaky and not all that useful. It reminds me of when voice assistants like Siri came out, and it turned out that the only thing they were good for was setting timers, controlling music playback, and gimmicky stuff like that.
replies(7): >>45658810 #>>45658906 #>>45659506 #>>45663857 #>>45665957 #>>45666402 #>>45682313 #
mapontosevenths ◴[] No.45658810[source]
Try it yourself and ignore the hype. For certain things it can be really useful, just keep in mind that it's early days.

I recently used Comet to find out of print movies that were never released on DVD/Bluray, then find them on ebay, then find the best value, then provide me with a list to order. It felt like magic watching it work, and saved me many hours of either doing it myself or scripting it.

I did have to repeatedly break it into ever smaller tasks to get everything to fit within the context windows, but still... it might have been janky but it was janky magic.

replies(3): >>45659108 #>>45659844 #>>45662633 #
TranquilMarmot ◴[] No.45659108[source]
Surely this is something you can do with simple searches...? Unless you're reaching the level of trying to buy dozens or hundreds of movies.

https://xkcd.com/1205/

replies(5): >>45659802 #>>45659818 #>>45661964 #>>45662874 #>>45663376 #
typon ◴[] No.45659818[source]
This xkcd comic doesn't apply anymore due to AI making generating automation code trivial.
replies(1): >>45662675 #
TranquilMarmot ◴[] No.45662675[source]
You're discounting the mental effort that goes into describing what you want to an LLM and then verifying the output, which is only worth it if it actually saves you time. Doing a simple search for a few DVDs does not seem worth the effort to me.
replies(1): >>45663405 #
1. mapontosevenths ◴[] No.45663405{3}[source]
It wasn't a few. There are literally thousands of films that never made the leap from VHS to DVD. My starting list was only a few hundred, but still it saved me hours.