←back to thread

270 points imasl42 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
greymalik ◴[] No.45659146[source]
> One could only wonder why they became a programmer in the first place, given their seeming disinterest in coding.

To solve problems. Coding is the means to an end, not the end itself.

> careful configuration of our editor, tinkering with dot files, and dev environments

That may be fun for you, but it doesn’t add value. It’s accidental complexity that I am happy to delegate.

replies(15): >>45659281 #>>45659294 #>>45659312 #>>45659328 #>>45659361 #>>45659373 #>>45659468 #>>45659961 #>>45660230 #>>45660862 #>>45661685 #>>45663128 #>>45664372 #>>45667053 #>>45676552 #
codyb ◴[] No.45660230[source]
Configuring editors, dot files, and dev environments consistently adds value by giving you familiarity with your working environment, honing your skills with your tools, and creating a more productive space tailored to your needs.

Who else becomes the go to person for modifying build scripts?

The amount of people I know who have no idea how to work with Git after decades in the field using it is pretty amazing. It's not helpful for everyone else when you're the one they're delegating their merge conflict bullshit too cause they've never bothered to learn anything about the tools they're using.

replies(1): >>45660978 #
mupuff1234 ◴[] No.45660978[source]
Have you considered that the problem is with Git and not the users?
replies(4): >>45662044 #>>45662179 #>>45662993 #>>45667948 #
1. dgunay ◴[] No.45662993{3}[source]
What about any tool, language, library, or codebase that is unnecessarily complex? Should we never bother to put in the effort to learn to use them? It doesn't mean they are without value to us as programmers. For better or worse, the hallmark of many good programmers I've met is a much higher than average tolerance for sitting down and just figuring out how something computer-related works instead of giving up and routing around it.