←back to thread

270 points imasl42 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.233s | source
Show context
aeblyve ◴[] No.45661139[source]
This process has been affecting most of the world's workers for the past several centuries. Programming has received a special treatment for the last few decades, and it's understandable that HN users would jump to protect their life investment, but it need not.

Hand-coding can continue, just like knitting co-exists with machine looms, but it need not ultimately maintain a grip on the software productive process.

It is better to come to terms with this reality sooner rather than later in my opinion.

replies(4): >>45661629 #>>45661784 #>>45662475 #>>45662708 #
1. muldvarp ◴[] No.45662475[source]
I think there is only a very narrow band where LLMs are good enough at producing software that "hand-coding" is genuinely dead but at the same time bad enough that (expensive) humans still need to be paid to be in the loop.