←back to thread

270 points imasl42 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
oldestofsports ◴[] No.45659173[source]
Getting rid of the programmer has always been the wet dream of managers, and LLMs are being sold as the solution.

Maybe it is

replies(1): >>45659992 #
commandlinefan ◴[] No.45659992[source]
This comes up whenever _anything_ is automated: "this is the end of programming as a career!" I heard this about Rational Rose in the 90's, and Visual Basic in the 80's.

I don't think I'm sticking my head in the sand - an advanced enough intelligence could absolutely take over programming tasks - but I also think that such an intelligence would be able to take over _every_ thought-related task. And that may not be a bad thing! Although the nature of our economy would have to change quite a bit to accommodate it.

I might be wrong: Doug Hofstadter, who is way, way smarter than me, once predicted that no machine would ever beat a human at chess unless it was the type of machine that said "I'm bored of chess now, I would prefer to talk about poetry". Maybe coding can be distilled to a set of heuristics the way chess programs have (I don't think so, but maybe).

Whether we're right or wrong, there's not much we can do about it except continue to learn.

replies(2): >>45660750 #>>45666971 #
1. pmg101 ◴[] No.45660750[source]
Visual Basic didn't exist in the 80's. First release was 1991.

Thanks for reminding me about Rational Rose though! That was a nostalgia trip

replies(1): >>45668814 #
2. commandlinefan ◴[] No.45668814[source]
Man, these days I'm lucky if I get the century right.