←back to thread

176 points Bogdanp | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
reedf1 ◴[] No.45653386[source]
Took me too long to realize this wasn't a tool to search for marginalia in scanned manuscripts.
replies(1): >>45658563 #
iamnothere ◴[] No.45658563[source]
Hey, at least it isn’t named after a very large number, an excited exclamation, or a sound effect. Surely no product with one of those names would ever succeed.
replies(1): >>45660167 #
1. marginalia_nu ◴[] No.45660167[source]
I probably should have named it cartoon-trombone.wav in retrospect.
replies(1): >>45666134 #
2. reedf1 ◴[] No.45666134[source]
It's a fine name! I had marginalia on the mind - I am reading The Name of the Rose.
replies(1): >>45667651 #
3. iamnothere ◴[] No.45667651[source]
That makes sense. I am perhaps overly sensitive to the drive by “name haters” who seem to show up in every FOSS or indie project thread.
replies(1): >>45668018 #
4. reedf1 ◴[] No.45668018{3}[source]
I feel a bit bad it was interpreted that way.

Some fun context, I was trying to find a scanned copy of the first 'correct' book on optics (written by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_al-Haytham). Possibly the first person to really use the scientific method in circa 1000CE (!!). And I found this (https://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/MS-PETERHOUSE-00209/103) filled with interesting optical diagrams like something out of my high school physics notebooks. Anyway - I was also thinking about how they might index interesting doodles in the margins. So it was on my mind.