←back to thread

615 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
estimator7292 ◴[] No.45651413[source]
Tl:dw for how this works:

He scans one line at a time with a mirror into a photomultiplier tube which can detect single photon events. This is captured continually at 2MSample/s (2 billion times per second: 2B FPS) with an oscilloscope and a clever hack.

The laser is actually pulsing at 30KHz, and the oscilloscope capture is synchronized to the laser pulse.

So we consider each 30KHz pulse a single event in a single pixel (even though the mirror is rotating continuously). So he runs the experiment 30,000 times per second, each one recording a single pixel at 2B FPS for a few microseconds. Each pixel-sized video is then tiled into a cohesive image

replies(7): >>45651508 #>>45651972 #>>45652361 #>>45652745 #>>45652878 #>>45655578 #>>45664301 #
easygenes ◴[] No.45651972[source]
Good explanation. One detail though: it is one pixel at a time, not one line at a time. Basically does the whole sequence for one pixel, adjusts mirror to next one, and does it again. The explanation is around the 8 minutes mark.

Just want to make it clear that in any one instant, only one pixel is being recorded. The mirror moves continuously across a horizontal sweep and a certain arc of the mirror's sweep is localized to a pixel in the video encoding sequence. A new laser pulse is triggered when one pixel of arc has been swept, recording a whole new complete mirror bounce sequence for each pixel sequentially. He has an additional video explaining the timing / triggering / synchronization circuit in more depth: https://youtu.be/WLJuC0q84IQ

replies(3): >>45652388 #>>45652582 #>>45660472 #
ehsankia ◴[] No.45652388[source]
One piece I'd like to see more clarification on is, is he doing multiple samples per pixel (like with ray tracing?). For his 1280x720 resolution video, that's around 900k pixels, so at 30Khz, it would take around 30s to record one of these videos if he were to doing one sample per pixel. But in theory he could run this for much longer and get a less noisy image.

I find it interesting that a project like this would easily be a PhD paper, but nowadays Youtubers do it just for the fun of it.

replies(5): >>45652894 #>>45653612 #>>45654290 #>>45660142 #>>45674912 #
1. rcxdude ◴[] No.45660142[source]
In one of the appendix videos he mentions that would improve the noise, the issue is the data rate exporting from the scope is a bottleneck and it would slow things down even more.