←back to thread

433 points zdw | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.417s | source
Show context
reenorap ◴[] No.45658455[source]
There needs to be a law that all nuclear and nuclear-adjacent facilities have no connection to the Internet. The fact it's allowed is unbelievable.
replies(16): >>45658869 #>>45658922 #>>45659008 #>>45659125 #>>45659155 #>>45659165 #>>45659210 #>>45659242 #>>45659399 #>>45659433 #>>45659476 #>>45659542 #>>45659733 #>>45660029 #>>45661258 #>>45666322 #
tcoff91 ◴[] No.45658922[source]
Wasn't the internet literally created by the military for military comms? The decentralized routing was in part to ensure that comms could survive some areas being taken out by nuclear weapons.
replies(3): >>45659144 #>>45660633 #>>45662081 #
SoftTalker ◴[] No.45659144[source]
As the effect of yesterday's AWS event demonstrates, the major Amazon, Microsoft, and Google data centers are surely top tier targets in every adversary's war plans.

The decentralized internet is less of a reality today than it was years ago.

replies(1): >>45659693 #
diggan ◴[] No.45659693[source]
Don't we have more internet submarine cables and less single points of failure in our internet infrastructure today than years ago? If so, shouldn't that make it easier to route around failures?

The web though I agree isn't very decentralized.

replies(2): >>45659982 #>>45662699 #
1. SoftTalker ◴[] No.45659982[source]
Maybe yes in that regard. But in the past, most organizations ran their own mail and web servers. Software supporting the business ran on-prem. Now they use Google or Azure or AWS. So business and civilian usage, at least, seem more vulnerable now.
replies(1): >>45661291 #
2. HippyTed ◴[] No.45661291[source]
We sacrificed resillience for effeciency. Now things are much more fragile and liable to exploitation.