←back to thread

ChatGPT Atlas

(chatgpt.com)
763 points easton | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
AustinDev ◴[] No.45658744[source]
Just to be meta, I downloaded the browser and added this thread as context and asked for some insightful comments I could leave (It doesn't seem to understand block-quoting format for this site):

Analytical / Insightful (well-received on HN)

> The interesting thing here isn’t that OpenAI made “a browser,” it’s that they’ve collapsed the boundary between the page and the assistant. Plugins and “GPTs” tried to bolt APIs onto chat; Atlas inverts that—chat is now the substrate for all interaction. > > It’s not hard to imagine a future where the web becomes more of an agent runtime than a hypertext medium. The real question is whether users will trust the runtime owner enough to live inside it.

Technical / Developer-oriented

> Everyone’s asking “is it Chromium,” but that’s missing the deeper move. Atlas is effectively an agentic runtime with privileged access to DOM and user context. The engine matters less than the control plane—who gets to mediate input/output between human, model, and site. > > That layer, not rendering, is the new “browser wars.”

Cautiously critical / philosophical

> Atlas looks less like a new browser and more like a new operating system for cognition. It’s powerful, but the trade-off is subtle: every convenience deepens the model’s visibility into what we do, not just what we search. The real competition now isn’t about tabs or engines—it’s about how much of our thinking we’re willing to outsource.

replies(8): >>45658812 #>>45658856 #>>45658877 #>>45658885 #>>45658891 #>>45658919 #>>45659016 #>>45659555 #
hbn ◴[] No.45658885[source]
I don't care about whether it's Chromium because of browser wars, I care about whether I can block ads.
replies(2): >>45658912 #>>45658925 #
Flux159 ◴[] No.45658912[source]
I was able to add ublock origin lite as an extension & it seems to work the same as Chrome.
replies(3): >>45658944 #>>45659388 #>>45659614 #
1. SeanAnderson ◴[] No.45658944[source]
uBlock origin lite kinda sucks compared to the OG uBlock, though. YouTube videos have this awkward buffering at the start now, sometimes YouTube homepage ads still load, sponsored placements on GrubHub/DoorDash appear and aren't able to be removed, etc.
replies(1): >>45659157 #
2. verdverm ◴[] No.45659157[source]
I thought that was more specific to YT than UB?

My UB experience remains largely unchanged since the switch to manifest v3, I pay for YT to avoid ads and support creators directly.

replies(1): >>45659341 #
3. SeanAnderson ◴[] No.45659341[source]
"I pay to remove ads so my experience with a neutered adblocker isn't as bad" is a weird take.

If you think the end game is companies deciding they're comfortable with removing ads in exchange for a subscription, rather than a subscription with a gradually increasing amount of ads, then I have a bridge to sell you.

I support the creators I watch by donating to them directly.

replies(1): >>45659684 #
4. verdverm ◴[] No.45659684{3}[source]
I use UB for all the other websites, not YT, it's a weird take to associate UB usage and experience with a single domain.

> I support the creators I watch by donating to them directly.

Me too, on top of the monthly fee that gets distributed to those I watch. More for every creator, even those I only watch once or sporadically

replies(1): >>45659859 #
5. SeanAnderson ◴[] No.45659859{4}[source]
I mentioned multiple domains...? I said it also impacts sponsored listings on food delivery platforms. Those used to be blocked and, more broadly, the ability to manually block specific elements of a webpage was lost with the transition to UB lite.