←back to thread

270 points imasl42 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
protontypes ◴[] No.45658345[source]
Whenever I see an em dash (—), I suspect the entire text was written by an AI.
replies(7): >>45658389 #>>45658467 #>>45658511 #>>45658615 #>>45658701 #>>45659004 #>>45660003 #
defgeneric ◴[] No.45658701[source]
I'm seeing this reaction a lot from younger people (say, roughly under 25). And it's a shame this new suspicion has now translated into a prohibition on the use of dashes.
replies(3): >>45658796 #>>45659059 #>>45659843 #
1. almosthere ◴[] No.45658796[source]
It's comical too because the only reason AI uses emdashes is because it was so common before AI.
replies(1): >>45659096 #
2. kazinator ◴[] No.45659096[source]
It's utterly uncommon in the kind of casual writing for which people are using AI, that's why it got noticed. Social media posts, blogs, ...

AI almost certainly picked it up mainly from typeset documents, like PDF papers.

It's also possible that some models have a tokenizing rule for recognizing faked-out em-dashes made of hyphens and turning them into real em-dash tokens.

replies(1): >>45662663 #
3. svat ◴[] No.45662663[source]
Not uncommon even on Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45071722

On my own (long abandoned) blog, about 20% of (public) posts seem to contain an em dash: https://shreevatsa.wordpress.com/?s=%E2%80%94 (going by 4 pages of search results for the em dash vs 21 pages in total).