←back to thread

141 points bibiver | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.495s | source
1. vlovich123 ◴[] No.45657207[source]
Nice. Since I/O is typically asynchronous, any ideas on how an async storage backend could be integrated elegantly?

Also do you have any benchmarks in the repo that would stress the I/O layer for latency too?

replies(1): >>45658454 #
2. bibiver ◴[] No.45658454[source]
open to integrate async storage backends. do you have one in mind? more benchmarks coming.