←back to thread

404 points voxleone | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.005s | source
Show context
radu_floricica ◴[] No.45655837[source]
I'm not really sure if keeping a strict schedule has any real relevance here, outside maybe PR and politics. Starships will drop the cost to other bodies in the same way Falcon dropped the cost to orbit. Why would anyone want to invest in a technology and a project that will be obsolete by the time it's implemented?
replies(5): >>45655867 #>>45655910 #>>45655981 #>>45656146 #>>45656398 #
saubeidl ◴[] No.45655981[source]
That is assuming Starship succeeds. Elon's track record hasn't exactly been stellar as of late.
replies(7): >>45656015 #>>45656055 #>>45656080 #>>45656170 #>>45656388 #>>45656976 #>>45660470 #
1. ecshafer ◴[] No.45656170[source]
Wasn't Elon kind of treated like a child to be distracted and kept at arms length at Spacex? He is apparently really really good at fundraising, marketing and publicity (well he used to be anyways). But the stories that have come out of Tesla, and Paypal and SpaceX seem to me like the people actually running the show have tried to distract him as much as possible, and any of his actual decisions have been awful. I recall a story from PayPal's early days where he wanted to swap the servers to windows, and then he got canned as the CEO.
replies(3): >>45656205 #>>45660108 #>>45661277 #
2. terminalshort ◴[] No.45660108[source]
When something goes wrong a one of Elon Musk's companies, it's clearly his fault. When something goes right, it's because he isn't actually running the company. Schrodinger's CEO!

But let's pretend for a minute that you're right and all Elon Musk does is hire great people that then do all the work building the company for him and keep him at arms length doing nothing. The skill to hire like that alone still puts him in the top 0.01% of CEOs.

3. electriclove ◴[] No.45661277[source]
If believing these things makes you feel better, great.
4. peterfirefly ◴[] No.45661696[source]
The one about PayPal and a switch to Windows isn't all wrong.
replies(1): >>45665490 #
5. radu_floricica ◴[] No.45665490{3}[source]
Yep, he was wrong about that one. He was also 20 something, I think.