←back to thread

404 points voxleone | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.319s | source
Show context
radu_floricica ◴[] No.45655837[source]
I'm not really sure if keeping a strict schedule has any real relevance here, outside maybe PR and politics. Starships will drop the cost to other bodies in the same way Falcon dropped the cost to orbit. Why would anyone want to invest in a technology and a project that will be obsolete by the time it's implemented?
replies(5): >>45655867 #>>45655910 #>>45655981 #>>45656146 #>>45656398 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.45655867[source]
> not really sure if keeping a strict schedule has any real relevance here

You don't see the relevance of Artemis III launching in mid-2027 [1] or 2028 versus, say, after November 2028?

[1] https://www.nasa.gov/mission/artemis-iii/

replies(3): >>45655925 #>>45656076 #>>45656100 #
cowsandmilk ◴[] No.45655925[source]
Does anyone vote for a president based on their ability to land on the moon?
replies(3): >>45655986 #>>45656087 #>>45656125 #
1. Waterluvian ◴[] No.45655986[source]
Holy crap yes. Millions of Americans vote for a president based on exceedingly dumber reasons too.