60k kids have avoided peanut allergies due to 2015 advice, study finds

There was a period of a few decades (I guess still ongoing, really) where parents sheltered their kids from everything. Playing in the dirt, peanuts, other allergens. It seems like all it's done is make people more vulnerable as adults. People assume babies are super fragile and delicate, and in many ways they are, but they also bounce back quickly.

Maybe part of it is a consequence of the risks of honey, which can actually spawn camp infants with botulism. But it seems that fear spread to everything.

"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger" makes for a fun little statement. It's not actual natural law though, right? I feel like it's fairly well documented that good hygiene is a win for humanity as a whole, so I have some skepticism for generally saying "well let the kids eat dirt". We did that for centuries already!

The thing I'm a bit curious about is how the research on peanut allergies leading to the sort of uhhh... cynic's common sense take ("expose em early and they'll be fine") is something that we only got to in 2015. Various allergies are a decently big thing in many parts of the world, and it feels almost anticlimactic that the dumb guy take here just applied, and we didn't get to that.

Maybe someone has some more details about any basis for the original guidelines

> "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger" makes for a fun little statement. It's not actual natural law though, right?

I'm pretty sure it is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immunological_memory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercompensation

No, it is not in any way a universal principle. The counterexample is Lead. A little lead in the diet does not make you stronger.

Only a sith deals in absolutes.

Nobody is suggesting you go and add some heavy metals to your corn flakes (except you).