←back to thread

A laser pointer at 2B FPS [video]

(www.youtube.com)
615 points thunderbong | 1 comments | 19 Oct 25 06:42 UTC | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
MostlyStable ◴[20 Oct 25 22:18 UTC] No.45650133[source]▶
As I understand it, this is sort of simulating what it would be like to capture this, by recreating the laser pulse and capturing different phases of it each time, then assembling them; so what is represented in the final composite is not a single pulse of the laser beam.

Would an upgraded version of this that was actually capable of capturing the progress of a single laser pulse through the smoke be a way of getting around the one-way speed of light limitation [0]? It seems like if you could measure the pulse's propagation in one direction, and the other (as measured by when it scatters of the smoke at various positions in both directions), this seems like it would get around it?

But it's been a while since I read an explanation for why we have the one-way limitation in the first place, so I could be forgetting something.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-way_speed_of_light

replies(5): >>45650372 #>>45650820 #>>45650856 #>>45650907 #>>45651129 #
1. bb88 ◴[21 Oct 25 00:00 UTC] No.45650907[source]▶
The problem (ignoring quantum mechanics) is that the sensors all require an EM field to operate in. So assuming that the speed of light was weighted with a vector in space-time, it would be affected everywhere -- including in the measurement apparatus.

If on the other hand one could detect a photon by sending out a different field, maybe a gravitational wave instead... well it might work, but the gravitational wave might be affected in exactly the same way that the EM field is affected.