←back to thread

178 points JumpCrisscross | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
legitster ◴[] No.45647922[source]
One of my conspiracy theories that I loosely hold is that the majority of the fears that we have been sold on allergies was a direct result of marketing efforts by the inventors of the Epipen.

Anaphylactic shock is extremely rare. And even in cases of anaphylactic shock, it's only fatal in an even rarer number of cases (which makes sense, anaphylactic shocks is a biological reaction of your body to save itself, not kill itself).

We really don't know how many lives emergency epinephrine has saved, but it may have only been necessary in less than 1 out of 50 cases. However, it benefitted the manufacturer to overemphasize the prevalence of dangerous food allergies and the risks of shock and encourage doctors to prescribe them in increasingly more "just in case" cases".

It's in this world that parents and doctors alike became insanely cautious and paranoid about introducing allergens. Conveniently, we saw the rise of simpler, more highly processed baby and childrens' foods at the same time.

replies(5): >>45648210 #>>45648225 #>>45648230 #>>45648663 #>>45650647 #
1. NoPicklez ◴[] No.45650647[source]
I don't know about this one, sounds a bit like anaphylactic shock isn't a big deal because we've made good strides in actually helping people manage and treat it. Which is a good thing, but we can't understate its severity.

Also, our bodies are good at doing things which are technically trying to save us, but actually kill us that doesn't mean we sit idle and do nothing about it, the same is for fevers.

Anaphylactic shock is the body reacting to protect itself against something that isn't actually harmful, but it is doing so to such an extreme that in many cases it kills you.

It's easy to look back at something as a conspiracy when the very impact of it has been mitigated for the average person due to proper healthcare.