Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    536 points helloguillecl | 14 comments | | HN request time: 1.1s | source | bottom
    1. jug ◴[] No.45649741[source]
    This could have been a 10 Megabyte TUI app in your terminal tab. Boggles my mind how even this kind of app manages to bring in Electron and the cloud.

    Edit: Ah, so here it is: https://posting.sh

    replies(6): >>45650164 #>>45651626 #>>45652525 #>>45652953 #>>45653703 #>>45663912 #
    2. dayson ◴[] No.45650164[source]
    Wow, I've been looking for a postman/Bruno/foo replacement that I could use inside a remote ssh server or remote dev containers in vs code. This might be it!
    3. blahgeek ◴[] No.45651626[source]
    > could have been a 10 Megabyte TUI app

    Wow, in a world dominated by gigabytes of electron application, people thinks 10 MB is the optimal size for a simple utility TUI app.

    As a reference, (from archlinux repo), vim’s install package is 2.3MB, curl is 1.2MB, lua (the complete language interpreter) is 362KB

    replies(2): >>45652559 #>>45653264 #
    4. troyvit ◴[] No.45652525[source]
    Oooh this is neat! I've been using hurl (https://hurl.dev/) for the last few years and while it's fun, I've ended up with a ton of text files floating around a folder instead of any kind of organization. Might have to try this.
    5. colonial ◴[] No.45652559[source]
    To be fair, Vim and Curl are almost certainly dynamically linked, so they get to "cheat" a little. 10 megs is entirely reasonable for a statically linked utility intended to "just work" when you dump it somewhere in your $PATH.

    Take the Micro editor. It's written in Go, and packs a fair bit of functionality into a single 12 meg static binary (of which a few megs is probably the runtime.)

    6. Mashimo ◴[] No.45652953[source]
    > even this kind of app manages to bring in Electron

    Probably because it began as an chrome addon before it was "standalone".

    replies(1): >>45653396 #
    7. supportengineer ◴[] No.45653264[source]
    640K ought to be enough for anyone.
    replies(2): >>45653569 #>>45653822 #
    8. wosined ◴[] No.45653396[source]
    Before Chrome became its addon*
    9. mangamadaiyan ◴[] No.45653569{3}[source]
    Indeed. It is the enigma of success in an industry with no franchise value.
    10. coldtea ◴[] No.45653703[source]
    Because enteprise type devs love this shit
    11. fuzztester ◴[] No.45653822{3}[source]
    - Bill Gates.

    And:

    The world does not need more than 4 computers.

    -Ken Olsen, or someone (in the mainframe days).

    (Both are alleged / apocryphal quotes. :)

    replies(2): >>45654180 #>>45655800 #
    12. nubinetwork ◴[] No.45654180{4}[source]
    I believe the Ken Olson quote was that nobody needed a computer in their house, but that was a time where businesses were using terminal servers... it would have been interesting to see where that would have went, but we might be heading that way again since we own nothing and everything is a only a temporary license.
    13. chuckadams ◴[] No.45655800{4}[source]
    The second quote was "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers", and it's attributed to Thomas Watson of IBM saying it in 1943. The real quote is indeed from Watson, but in 1953, summarizing the sales projections of a specific model of machine, and noting that they actually sold 18 of them.

    https://freakonomics.com/2008/04/our-daily-bleg-did-ibm-real...

    Gates denies ever saying anything like the 640K quote, but it was possibly someone at Microsoft being salty about the 640K limit that IBM had imposed on the PC through its design.

    14. chrysoprace ◴[] No.45663912[source]
    Posting has been the most lucrative option for me so far, but it'll take me some time to get used to the keybindings.