←back to thread

Space Elevator

(neal.fun)
1773 points kaonwarb | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jvanderbot ◴[] No.45643427[source]
Very cool. One thing I wish was better shown: space is close, it's just hard to go up. Our liveable breathable atmosphere is razor thin compared to the size of earth.

In most cases, 100km is less than the distance between sizeable metropolitan areas. It's a day long bike ride. Air runs out less than a bus ride across town. A 15k jog/hike would put you in the stratosphere. Those jet aircraft that seem so high are closer than that. Closer than your friends house or the local stadium probably.

Look at a map or globe with that in mind and everything feels so thin!

replies(9): >>45643658 #>>45646207 #>>45646233 #>>45646338 #>>45646829 #>>45646910 #>>45647596 #>>45647668 #>>45648223 #
hinkley ◴[] No.45648223[source]
In a parallel universe where Africa is covered by world powers, Mount Kilimanjaro would make a pretty good launch facility. Reduced rocket equation needs for being nearly 3 miles high. If you start in thinner atmosphere you need less fuel to punch through it. You’re also higher when you hit Max Q.

This is essentially what Scaled Composites and Virgin Galactic were trying to do with their cargo plane system, only you don’t have to worry about the ignition timing because you’re not in free fall.

replies(2): >>45648416 #>>45653076 #
rozab ◴[] No.45648416[source]
The most important feature of a launch site is having no populated areas downrange. Kilimanjaro would have Mombasa downrange.

I don't know of any launch sites significantly above sea-level, the marginal performance increase wouldn't be worth the logistical nightmare. It's easier to fly up a 747 than build a launch facility on top of a mountain.

replies(2): >>45648874 #>>45649683 #
1. hinkley ◴[] No.45649683{3}[source]
Mombasa is the shortest path to the ocean from the top of the mountain, that’s true. However that is not a good angle for an equatorial orbit.

What’s the downrange safety cone look like for space launch sites around the world? A little S curve in your insertion orbit would certainly waste a bit of delta V. But not all orbits are equatorial anyway.