←back to thread

Space Elevator

(neal.fun)
1773 points kaonwarb | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.458s | source
Show context
jvanderbot ◴[] No.45643427[source]
Very cool. One thing I wish was better shown: space is close, it's just hard to go up. Our liveable breathable atmosphere is razor thin compared to the size of earth.

In most cases, 100km is less than the distance between sizeable metropolitan areas. It's a day long bike ride. Air runs out less than a bus ride across town. A 15k jog/hike would put you in the stratosphere. Those jet aircraft that seem so high are closer than that. Closer than your friends house or the local stadium probably.

Look at a map or globe with that in mind and everything feels so thin!

replies(9): >>45643658 #>>45646207 #>>45646233 #>>45646338 #>>45646829 #>>45646910 #>>45647596 #>>45647668 #>>45648223 #
messe ◴[] No.45643658[source]
> it's just hard to go up

Going up is the comparatively easy part, it's not exactly rocket science. Going fast enough sideways so you stay up there is the tricky bit.

replies(6): >>45643965 #>>45644286 #>>45646224 #>>45649112 #>>45652691 #>>45654212 #
Pxtl ◴[] No.45644286[source]
Which is another part of why a space elevator is nifty - by definition it extends out to a distance where you are going fast-enough-sideways.

Now, I have no idea how practical it is to build one (Angela Collier has a video saying it's kinda ridiculous), but it's a cool idea.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5aHMB4Tje4

Also since rockets have moved away from hydrolox, it would be nice to have a greener launching system.

replies(2): >>45644652 #>>45652514 #
raducu ◴[] No.45644652[source]
> Angela Collier has a video saying it's kinda ridiculous.

There are other concepts like space fountains, orbital rings and sky hooks that seem more doable -- especially the sky hook seems close to do-able, especially on the Moon.

replies(2): >>45646839 #>>45652596 #
1. BobaFloutist ◴[] No.45646839[source]
What if we just made a huge mountain? Space ramp? Is that anything?
replies(1): >>45647158 #
2. estimator7292 ◴[] No.45647158[source]
IIRC there is no material we're aware of that has anywhere near enough compressive strength to build that high, regardless of how wide the base is.

Space elevators only (theoretically) work because the entire structure is in tension. And the only material we currently know of that can handle the tensile forces is carbon fiber.