←back to thread

152 points isoprophlex | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
floatrock ◴[] No.45645042[source]
The buried lede:

Anthropic: "$2.66 billion on compute on an estimated $2.55 billion in revenue"

Cursor: "bills more than doubled from $6.2 million in May 2025 to $12.6 million in June 2025"

Clickthrough if you want the analysis and caveats

replies(3): >>45645136 #>>45645251 #>>45645727 #
Kuinox ◴[] No.45645251[source]
I could find an ARR for Cursor of $500M. Why do they they in this article that Cursor is loosing with this spending number ?
replies(2): >>45645476 #>>45645542 #
LetsGetTechnicl ◴[] No.45645476[source]
Ed's mentioned ARR in previous articles and it's not a "generally accepted accounting principle". They cherry pick the highest monthly revenue number and multiply that by 12, but that's not their actual annual revenue.
replies(2): >>45645513 #>>45645578 #
dcre ◴[] No.45645513[source]
"Cherry pick the highest" is misleading. If your revenue is growing 10% a month for a year straight and is not seasonal, picking any other than the most recent month to annualize would make no sense.
replies(2): >>45645733 #>>45645830 #
LetsGetTechnicl ◴[] No.45645830[source]
Well people like Sam Altman have not been entirely honest and there's a reason they're not sharing their actual revenue numbers. If they could show they were growing 10% every month they would.
replies(1): >>45646058 #
dcre ◴[] No.45646058[source]
They are sharing their actual revenue numbers. That's what ARR is. Take the number and divide it by 12 and that's monthly revenue.
replies(1): >>45646109 #
1. LetsGetTechnicl ◴[] No.45646109{3}[source]
It's literally not ARR is the highest monthly revenue times 12. Dividing it by 12 doesn't get you the actual, on the books monthly revenue numbers.