←back to thread

674 points peterkshultz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
neilv ◴[] No.45638049[source]
Some good advice, but two of the pieces surprised me:

> Go to the prof before final exam at least once for office hours. - Even if you have no questions (make something up!) Profs will sometimes be willing to say more about a test in 1on1 basis (things they would not disclose in front of the entire class). Don't expect it, but when this does happen, it helps a lot. Does this give you an unfair advantage over other students? Sometimes. It's a little shady :) But in general it is a good idea to let the prof get to know you at least a little.

Were I a professor, and a student showed up to my office hours, to disingenuous BS me (e.g., making something up to get face time to advance their sociopath career, or to try to get exclusive hints on the exam), that would not be to their advantage.

ProTip: I wouldn't be thinking "What a wonderfully go-getter young person; I should write them a good recommendation, to help them gain more influence. Stanford hasn't inflicted nearly enough people like this upon the world."

> If things are going badly and you get too tired, in emergency situations, jug an energy drink. - They work. It's just chemistry.*

Half of the students are already drugged to the gills. Students don't need celebrity alum endorsement of that.

You don't want people graduading as drugged-out zombies and narcissists, to then go on to found or lead sociopathic companies that make society worse.

replies(3): >>45638095 #>>45638126 #>>45645660 #
1. OkayPhysicist ◴[] No.45645660[source]
If someone can't figure out how to take advantage of widely available stimulants, it's a dramatic disadvantage in frankly all facets of life. There's no prize for deliberately hampering yourself by refusing to use the tools available to you.