←back to thread

615 points thunderbong | 7 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
1. Neywiny ◴[] No.45639559[source]
I thought his method of multiplexing the single channel was very smart. I guess it's more common on 2 channel or high end 4 channel scopes to have a dedicated trigger input, which I've checked this one doesn't have. That said, there're digital inputs that could've been used. Presumably from whatever was controlling the laser.
replies(1): >>45651360 #
2. estimator7292 ◴[] No.45651360[source]
Frankly it's uncommon to not have a trigger input. I'm not sure I've ever seen a DSO in person without a trigger in.
replies(2): >>45651844 #>>45654472 #
3. MBCook ◴[] No.45651844[source]
I was confused by that part of the video exactly because I wondered why he wasn’t using the trigger input. Or, would it normally be possible to use a different channel as the trigger for the first channel?
replies(1): >>45651904 #
4. db48x ◴[] No.45651904{3}[source]
He explained that. His inexpensive oscilloscope _can_ trigger from the second channel, but only at one billion samples per second. Where’s the fun in that?
replies(1): >>45655507 #
5. Neywiny ◴[] No.45654472[source]
I guess I'm used to it. My main scope is an SDS1204 which doesn't have one (and when I inherited it the digital channels were reportedly blown up) despite being fairly capable for its combination of age and price
6. MBCook ◴[] No.45655507{4}[source]
Oh that’s right. I saw this video earlier in the week and forgot that.

Thanks.

replies(1): >>45657157 #
7. db48x ◴[] No.45657157{5}[source]
You’re welcome.