←back to thread

29 points DaveZale | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
pavel_lishin ◴[] No.45569161[source]
> The existence of two black holes in OJ287 was first suggested in 1982. Aimo Sillanpää, then a graduate student at the University of Turku, observed that the brightness of the quasar changed regularly over a 12-year cycle.

Damn, that's about the time it takes Jupiter to orbit the sun. That feels wildly close together for objects that mass 18 billion & 150 million times that of our own sun.

These black holes (according to a calculator I found online) have radii of 53 billion km and 400 million km, so I'm guessing they must be orbiting significantly further away, and significantly faster than Jupiter (which is ~800 million km away from the sun) - which makes sense, given the monstrous 18b figure. I wonder how far apart they are, but I don't really know how to easily calculate that right now.

replies(5): >>45569325 #>>45569349 #>>45569488 #>>45569727 #>>45574302 #
hinkley ◴[] No.45569325[source]
How much time dilation do you get at those masses though?

I’m having more trouble visualizing how accretion disks would work for a binary black hole. Because the light is coming from the disks, not the black holes. So those are what are actually pulsing/girating.

replies(2): >>45569366 #>>45569375 #
ardel95 ◴[] No.45569375[source]
Unless I screwed up the math, they would be quarter of a light year apart. Plenty of space for each black hole to form its own accretion disk.
replies(1): >>45573155 #
1. hinkley ◴[] No.45573155[source]
Oh that chart is really awful then. It’s showing an accretion disk that’s half a light year in diameter at least.