←back to thread

Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move

(www.makeuseof.com)
522 points josephcsible | 1 comments | 13 Oct 25 15:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
HiPhish ◴[13 Oct 25 16:27 UTC] No.45570232[source]▶
We need to stop calling it "sideloading", we should call it freely installing software. The term "sideloading" makes it sound shady and hacky when in reality it is what we have been able to do on our computers since forever. These are not phones, they are computers shaped like phones, computer which we fully bought with our money, and I we shall install what we want on our own computers.
replies(13): >>45570367 #>>45570379 #>>45570432 #>>45570481 #>>45570663 #>>45570698 #>>45570888 #>>45570921 #>>45571652 #>>45571793 #>>45571892 #>>45572581 #>>45573419 #
1. koolala ◴[13 Oct 25 19:49 UTC] No.45572581[source]▶
How badly screwed are we that the term "installing" doesn't work because it doesn't exclude the now default assumption that someone else controls everything you are allowed to install.