←back to thread

Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move

(www.makeuseof.com)
522 points josephcsible | 1 comments | 13 Oct 25 15:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
itg ◴[13 Oct 25 16:13 UTC] No.45570037[source]▶
Installing any app I want outside the Play Store was the primary reason I decided to go with Android, despite most of the people I know using iPhones. If I can't do this anymore, I may as well switch and be able to use iMessage and FaceTime with them.
replies(15): >>45570221 #>>45570261 #>>45570265 #>>45570587 #>>45570668 #>>45572259 #>>45572346 #>>45573245 #>>45573688 #>>45573719 #>>45573848 #>>45573983 #>>45574065 #>>45574119 #>>45574318 #
jadbox ◴[13 Oct 25 16:29 UTC] No.45570261[source]▶
You can still install apps outside the play store, but the developer does need to verify their signing information. Effectively this means that any app you install must have a paper trail to the originating developer, even if its not on the app store. On one hand, I can see the need for this to track down virus creators, but on the other, it provides Google transparency and control over side loaded app. It IS a concerning move, but currently this is far from 'killing' non-appstore apps for most of the market.
replies(10): >>45570571 #>>45570633 #>>45570634 #>>45570683 #>>45571257 #>>45571700 #>>45572133 #>>45572345 #>>45573858 #>>45574064 #
AdmiralAsshat ◴[13 Oct 25 18:24 UTC] No.45571700[source]▶
So let's pick a random example app that might be popular on F-Droid today. Oh, I dunno...newpipe.

Given that Google both owns Android/Google Play Store and YouTube: what do you think they would do with the developer information of someone who makes an app that skirts their ad-model for YouTube?

replies(2): >>45572107 #>>45572660 #
1. ACCount37 ◴[13 Oct 25 19:05 UTC] No.45572107[source]▶
I can't help but feel that this move is aimed specifically at ReVanced.

The "security" wording is the usual corpospeak - you can always trust "security" to mean "the security of our business model, of course, why are you asking?"