←back to thread

Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move

(www.makeuseof.com)
424 points josephcsible | 5 comments | 13 Oct 25 15:24 UTC | HN request time: 1.18s | source
Show context
rclkrtrzckr ◴[13 Oct 25 16:57 UTC] No.45570628[source]▶
> This logic is flawed: historically, we've seen malware slip through the Play Store—signed and “verified”—several times.

Yeah, check for all the fake sora apps in the play store.

replies(1): >>45571311 #
1. bitpush ◴[13 Oct 25 17:52 UTC] No.45571311[source]▶
This is a weak argument. If things have slipped through the cracks with someone actively reviewing it, the alternative cant be 'lets not do any checking whatsoever'.

There are better arguments against this that other commenters here have provided (including "my device, my rule") but this isnt a strong argument.

replies(3): >>45572242 #>>45572324 #>>45573045 #
2. nubinetwork ◴[13 Oct 25 19:17 UTC] No.45572242[source]▶
That's the thing, they don't review their apps, and they actively ignore people flagging apps that are scams or otherwise malicious. Much like their ad empire, its all bots and people making money for pretending to care.
replies(1): >>45573064 #
3. BrenBarn ◴[13 Oct 25 19:25 UTC] No.45572324[source]▶
It's not "let's not do any checking whatsoever", it's just "let individual users choose between Google's ineffective checking and alternative app sources that users can trust or not trust with zero involvement from Google".
4. ycombinatrix ◴[13 Oct 25 20:34 UTC] No.45573045[source]▶
That would make sense except they aren't doing any app reviews lol. They're just scanning your government ID. It is a farce.
5. kube-system ◴[13 Oct 25 20:35 UTC] No.45573064[source]▶
The number of malicious apps that Google has removed from the Play Store is far from zero.

It is false to say they are great at it. It's also false to say they don't review it. They remove some, but they're not great at it.