←back to thread

358 points ofalkaed | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.251s | source

Just curious and who knows, maybe someone will adopt it or develop something new based on its ideas.
1. educasean ◴[] No.45560957[source]
Google Stadia.

They had built a solid streaming platform for low latency cloud gaming but failed hard on actually having interesting games to play on it. You just can't launch a gaming platform with a handful of games that have been available everywhere and expect it to succeed.

replies(3): >>45564385 #>>45565212 #>>45574139 #
2. morshu9001 ◴[] No.45564385[source]
I liked Stadia. There are plenty of competitors, but Google had the technical edge.
3. timonofathens ◴[] No.45565212[source]
+1 I really loved Stadia

I had a good connection and sometimes I forgot I was streaming a game.

At least the died gracefully, I played for free and also got a chromecast + controller out of the deal

4. joquarky ◴[] No.45574139[source]
I liked the idea, but Google already had a reputation of killing off good projects when Stadia was launched, so I didn't want to buy games that would disappear when Google got bored of maintaining it.