←back to thread

131 points pgedge_postgres | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
foreigner ◴[] No.45536174[source]
What are the pros and cons of this compared to CockroachDB?
replies(3): >>45536200 #>>45536648 #>>45538518 #
traceroute66 ◴[] No.45538518[source]
> compared to CockroachDB

CockroachDB != PostgreSQL.

I take great issue with the way CockroachDB marketing seeks to imply compatability, when infact what they are promising is wire protocol compatability (i.e. you can fire up your copy of psql on the CLI and it will connect).

Last time I looked, a great number of primitive, obvious, fundamental, low-hanging fruit were completely absent from CockroachDB, e.g. (IIRC) stored procedures are nowhere to be seen in CockroachDB.

replies(1): >>45540411 #
1. bonesmoses ◴[] No.45540411[source]
You can't even run pgbench unaltered on CockroachDB, as simple table structures and indexes are fundamentally different there. It is in no way a compatible product, and never has been.