←back to thread

516 points pykello | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.248s | source
Show context
kmijyiyxfbklao ◴[] No.45536880[source]
That's interesting. I think the last Venezuelan election showed there are limits to what you can accomplish with peace.
replies(2): >>45536902 #>>45537109 #
davedx ◴[] No.45536902[source]
Of course there are limits to everything, but conversely look at what people like Gandhi achieved
replies(4): >>45536929 #>>45537256 #>>45538698 #>>45539256 #
XorNot ◴[] No.45537256[source]
I've become increasingly uncomfortable with these sorts of casual throwabouts of extremely complex and unique geopolitical situations though. Gandhi existed in a particular moment and context - take the same man and put him up against a different regime, and you would not get the same outcome.

It's like how people talk up peaceful protest by referencing Martin Luther King. He was a major centralizing figure for civil rights, but he did not exist in a vacuum of context either.

replies(1): >>45538422 #
1. Cyph0n ◴[] No.45538422[source]
Precisely. Liberation movements have various tools at their disposal. But using the same tool in a different context does not guarantee a similar outcome.

On Gandhi in particular, many do not realize that there were parallel movements inside India that did resort to violence. So the context is not as simple as it may seem.