←back to thread

137 points samray | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.931s | source
Show context
andy99 ◴[] No.45537729[source]
> The only downside was that although we broke through the network restrictions and could access any website, the plane’s bandwidth was extremely limited, making web browsing quite painful.

Unfortunately this is also the downside of paying. Many times I have paid for internet, only to find it unusably bad. To be fair, I just flew a transcontinental flight on Air Canada the other day and the wifi was fine.

replies(3): >>45537828 #>>45538362 #>>45540018 #
1. CrossVR ◴[] No.45537828[source]
This is likely another layer of security that they didn't break through:

To prevent chat apps from consuming lots of bandwidth typically your connection is severely bandwidth restricted until you pay. If they didn't then someone could simply stream movies from their chat apps.

replies(1): >>45538687 #
2. ms7m ◴[] No.45538687[source]
I don't think so, compared to transcontinental, which lately (before Starlink) has been using the cell towers on the ground + satellite backhaul -- even paying would probably still result in a garbage experience.
replies(1): >>45538815 #
3. armada651 ◴[] No.45538815[source]
The point is that if the connection does have more bandwidth available they wouldn't get that extra bandwidth without paying.