←back to thread

Figure 03, our 3rd generation humanoid robot

(www.figure.ai)
392 points lairv | 3 comments | 09 Oct 25 13:27 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
HAL3000 ◴[09 Oct 25 14:59 UTC] No.45528648[source]▶
All of the examples in videos are cherry picked. Go ask anyone working on humanoid robots today, almost everything you see here, if repeated 10 times, will enter failure mode because the happy path is so narrow. There should really be benchmarks where you invite robots from different companies, ask them beforehand about their capabilities, and then create an environment that is within those capabilities but was not used in the training data, and you will see the real failure rate. These things are not ready for anything besides tech demos currently. Most of the training is done in simulations that approximate physics, and the rest is done manually by humans using joysticks (almost everything they do with hands). Failure rates are staggering.
replies(17): >>45529270 #>>45529335 #>>45529542 #>>45529760 #>>45529839 #>>45529903 #>>45529962 #>>45530530 #>>45531634 #>>45532178 #>>45532431 #>>45532651 #>>45533534 #>>45533814 #>>45534991 #>>45539498 #>>45542410 #
wongarsu ◴[09 Oct 25 16:22 UTC] No.45529839[source]▶
The last example they show (pick up package from pile, put it label-down on conveyor, repeat) seems to be the most realistic. They even have an uncut video of their previous model doing that for an hour on twitter [1].

I'm not sure that task needs a humanoid robot, but the ability to grab and manipulate all those packages and recover from failures is pretty good

1: https://x.com/adcock_brett/status/1931391783306678515

replies(2): >>45533035 #>>45536263 #
aDyslecticCrow ◴[09 Oct 25 21:00 UTC] No.45533035[source]▶
> I'm not sure that task needs a humanoid robot

An industrial robot arm with air powered suction cups would do the trick... https://bostondynamics.com/products/stretch/ ...

... So the task they work best at is the task there is already cheaper better robots specialized for.

replies(3): >>45533210 #>>45533235 #>>45533299 #
93po ◴[09 Oct 25 21:22 UTC] No.45533235[source]▶
I think the use case here is smaller to medium size businesses that don't need a $150k suction robot arm 24/7, but do need 24/7 help with warehousing, packaging, restocking, taking inventory, sorting mailing, applying shipping labes, etc. With a single humanoid robot you can do all that for, at some point, possibly as low as $20k for a one-time robot purchase.
replies(3): >>45533479 #>>45534054 #>>45543689 #
blackguardx ◴[09 Oct 25 21:51 UTC] No.45533479[source]▶
Why do you think a humanoid robot will be cheaper than a robot arm?
replies(2): >>45533944 #>>45535661 #
xky ◴[09 Oct 25 23:04 UTC] No.45533944{4}[source]▶
If humanoid robots can perform ok on a broader set of tasks then they could reach economies of scale that a robot arm might not.
replies(2): >>45534303 #>>45534680 #
1. aerostable_slug ◴[10 Oct 25 00:09 UTC] No.45534303{5}[source]▶
To add to that, a good friend of mine is a welder and machinist (and still using Linux on the desktop years after I set him up). A robot 'helper' that just moves things around and maybe does basic machine work (cutting pipe and threading the ends, for example) would put his productivity through the roof. Same story with a guy who specializes in kitchen remodeling.

It's hard to find decent general purpose help these days and they would pay good money for a halfway useful helper.

Once it's able to weld... That's going to be a massive game changer, and I can see that coming 'round the corner right quickly.

replies(1): >>45535961 #
2. sneak ◴[10 Oct 25 06:41 UTC] No.45535961[source]▶
Once it’s able to weld and climb then building skyscrapers will become a lot easier and cheaper as you don’t need safety equipment for them.
replies(1): >>45538857 #
3. darkwater ◴[10 Oct 25 13:36 UTC] No.45538857[source]▶
Yeah, just let them fall on top on someone/something below!