←back to thread

392 points lairv | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
cooper_ganglia ◴[] No.45530893[source]
Crazy to me how negative the comments are here. None of this was even remotely possible less than 5 years ago. Now, we're demoing consumer-facing robotics that will soon, within a couple iterations, be able to perform most of your household tasks without issue.

The frog boils quickly.

replies(12): >>45530966 #>>45531624 #>>45532275 #>>45532960 #>>45534200 #>>45534868 #>>45535145 #>>45536581 #>>45537839 #>>45539240 #>>45539283 #>>45540004 #
paxys ◴[] No.45531624[source]
> None of this was even remotely possible less than 5 years ago.

Boston Dynamics has been releasing actual product demos of such robots (not cherry-picked ads) for ~20 years now. Not a single one has graduated to any mass market real world use case.

I'm not saying one shouldn't be hopeful, but it's also not hard to see why people here are generally more conservative about the near future.

replies(8): >>45531715 #>>45531913 #>>45531950 #>>45531960 #>>45532265 #>>45532322 #>>45533268 #>>45535021 #
1. 93po ◴[] No.45533268[source]
BD up until very recently only focused on hydraulics were which were extremely loud, expensive, bulky, and expensive to maintain. It was basically impossible to find a use case for such a thing that didn't have to cohabitate in spaces with humans. They also lacked the modeling for it to do much of anything other than walk, and even then recent advances in ML have in only a couple of years massively outperformed their in-house attempts that took 20.

BD was a money-burning machine that suckled off the teat of the miltiary industrial complex, where billions of dollars can be casually lost and there's no accountability and no one notices its gone. Their tech was cool, though, and their engineers did awesome work.