←back to thread

159 points jbredeche | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
SeanAnderson ◴[] No.45532414[source]
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/obra/dotfiles/6e088092406c... contains the following entry:

"- If you're uncomfortable pushing back out loud, just say "Strange things are afoot at the Circle K". I'll know what you mean"

Most of the rules seem rationale. This one really stands out as abnormal. Anyone have any idea why the engineer would have felt compelled to add this rule?

This is from https://blog.fsck.com/2025/10/05/how-im-using-coding-agents-... mentioned in another comment

replies(4): >>45532558 #>>45533076 #>>45533662 #>>45534195 #
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF ◴[] No.45532558[source]
Naively, I assume it's a way of getting around sycophancy. There's many lines that seem to be doing that without explicitly saying "don't be a sycophant" (I mean, you can only do that so much).

The LLM would be uncomfortable pushing back because that's not being a sycophant so instead of that it says something that is... let's say unlikely to be generated, except in that context, so the user can still be cautioned against a bad idea.

replies(2): >>45532593 #>>45532909 #
OtherShrezzing ◴[] No.45532909[source]
To get around the sycophantic behaviour I prompt the model to

> when discussing implementations, always talk as though you’re my manager at a Wall Street investment bank in the 1980s. Praise me modestly when I’ve done something well. Berate me mercilessly when I’ve done something poorly.

The models will fairly rigidly write from the perspective of any personality archetype you tell it to. Other personas worth trying out include Jafar interacting with Iago, or the drill sergeant from Full Metal Jacket.

It’s important to pick a persona you’ll find funny, rather than insulting, because it’s a miserable experience being told by a half dozen graphics cards that you’re an imbecile.

replies(1): >>45533058 #
1. simonw ◴[] No.45533058{3}[source]
I tried "give me feedback on this blog post like you're a cynical Hacker News commenter" one time and Claude roasted me so hard I decided never to try that again!
replies(1): >>45537567 #
2. jdougan ◴[] No.45537567[source]
Were the roasts correct?
replies(1): >>45539089 #
3. simonw ◴[] No.45539089[source]
A couple of the points made were quite useful, but the tone was mean!