←back to thread

263 points mooreds | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hibikir ◴[] No.45421738[source]
Hiring juniors is always great if you, somehow, have a much better filter for finding the stars than the rest of the market. But if you don't, hiring bad juniors is a disaster: No different than outsourcing bits to a bad satellite office.

So are you actually good at finding the good juniors in this very difficult environment? Can you change your hiring machinery to improve, as most traditional ways have stopped working? Because hiring a lot of juniors that don't work out sure can kill companies.

replies(4): >>45421781 #>>45421872 #>>45422482 #>>45429714 #
goalieca ◴[] No.45421781[source]
Hire one junior per team. Don’t overload your senior staff with OKRs and managerial tasks. Let mentorship and apprenticeship happen.
replies(2): >>45421859 #>>45421956 #
thaumasiotes ◴[] No.45421956[source]
> Let mentorship and apprenticeship happen.

There has never been an apprenticeship model where one apprentice is trained by several masters. It's always the other way around.

replies(1): >>45422040 #
1. worthless-trash ◴[] No.45422040{3}[source]
Said with such conviction, yet so wrong. Ask any "non mcdojo" kung-fu school if they consider training under a single master to be sufficient.
replies(1): >>45422447 #
2. thaumasiotes ◴[] No.45422447[source]
In what sense do you believe that's an "apprenticeship"?
replies(1): >>45434015 #
3. worthless-trash ◴[] No.45434015[source]
Apprentice is:

A person who is learning a trade from a skilled employer, having agreed to work for a fixed period at low wages.

This fits the bill at leat in the MA "training programs" that I'm aware of, but again I'm not training at overseas dojos.