←back to thread

67 points ceejayoz | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.798s | source | bottom
Show context
SilverElfin ◴[] No.45415187[source]
Civil forfeiture is something both sides agree is unconstitutional and wrong. Why has it taken so long to ban it and hold people accountable?
replies(8): >>45415239 #>>45415479 #>>45415489 #>>45415512 #>>45416144 #>>45416434 #>>45420020 #>>45422532 #
1. ceejayoz ◴[] No.45415239[source]
Because American police bomb (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Alioto), riot (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrolmen%27s_Benevolent_Assoc...), and doxx (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/01/nyregion/chiara-de-blasio...) when they don't get their way.
replies(3): >>45415624 #>>45416483 #>>45416505 #
2. mothballed ◴[] No.45415624[source]
After the police agencies in California threw such a fit that the courts made concealed carry 'shall' issue, the government threw such a fit that they wholesale published the names, addresses, and DROS details of everyone in California with a CCW, including say DV victims that might be in hiding and even hilariously judges and prosecutors [].

They tried to make it sound like a 'leak', but it was published on a polished government website that let you filter and aggregate the results.

[]https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-06-29/californ...

replies(1): >>45416438 #
3. potato3732842 ◴[] No.45416438[source]
How much of that was the police and how much of that was the politicians? Because the politicians were pretty pissed off about that too.
4. ◴[] No.45416483[source]
5. red_rech ◴[] No.45416505[source]
If we can use the military to sweep up petty criminals and drug addicts we can do the same for a violent armed paramilitary no?
replies(1): >>45416520 #
6. mrguyorama ◴[] No.45416520[source]
We cannot, because we voted for the people who "back the blue" no matter what.

Vote for different people if you want change.