←back to thread

A human-accelerated neuron type potentially underlying autism in humans

(academic.oup.com)
185 points ivewonyoung | 2 comments | 28 Sep 25 23:32 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mikert89 ◴[29 Sep 25 00:24 UTC] No.45409274[source]▶
Pretty clear theres a tradeoff between social intelligence and other forms of intelligence
replies(5): >>45409330 #>>45409381 #>>45409400 #>>45409775 #>>45411139 #
dyauspitr ◴[29 Sep 25 00:44 UTC] No.45409381[source]▶
Einstein seemed to have absolutely no problems with his social life. Newton on the other hand lived and died alone, possibly a virgin.
replies(5): >>45409416 #>>45409439 #>>45409440 #>>45409561 #>>45409589 #
hollerith ◴[29 Sep 25 00:56 UTC] No.45409440[source]▶
In Western Europe in the 1600s, being a virgin didn't make you a loser in most people's eyes like it does now.

Newton had long friendships with other leading intellectual figures (Edmund Halley, John Locke, mathematician David Gregory).

replies(1): >>45409731 #
dyauspitr ◴[29 Sep 25 01:56 UTC] No.45409731[source]▶
Never being married did however.
replies(2): >>45410074 #>>45410117 #
1. hollerith ◴[29 Sep 25 03:24 UTC] No.45410074[source]▶
There are essentially no married virgins, i.e., essentially all the virgins are unmarried, so it seems inconsistent to consider the unmarried as losers but not the virgins.
replies(1): >>45410880 #
2. lelanthran ◴[29 Sep 25 06:29 UTC] No.45410880[source]▶
> There are essentially no married virgins,

Which is something I point out to JWs rude enough to interrupt my Sunday breakfast. Which of the following scenarios present as most likely:

1. A married couple, living together as a married couple, had never had sex, or

2. They had sex