←back to thread

185 points ivewonyoung | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mikert89 ◴[] No.45409274[source]
Pretty clear theres a tradeoff between social intelligence and other forms of intelligence
replies(5): >>45409330 #>>45409381 #>>45409400 #>>45409775 #>>45411139 #
ACCount37 ◴[] No.45409330[source]
Is there now?

High functioning autism exists, but autism in general doesn't seem to give any advantage to general intelligence. And the low end of functioning in autism is really, really low.

replies(2): >>45409489 #>>45409578 #
jiggawatts ◴[] No.45409578[source]
An observation I've made is that the most people ("the general population") will compromise on hard facts without pause to attain social goals. I.e.: They will follow instructions from a workplace superior with zero push-back even if the instructions are total nonsense or impossible to physically implement.

It's a rare breed (1-2%) of the population that will actively push back, insist on facts, and stick to only the "hard, unyielding reality" of physics, chemistry, mathematics, physics, logic, etc...

There is a very high correlation between these types of people and autistic people.

You have to not care about how other people "feel" or what their conflicting priorities might be to prioritise reality above the personal whims of others.

To be truly intelligent, you have to be able to call the emperor naked.

PS: It's easy to disagree with the above, but this is invariably an instance of "the fish is the last to know it lives in water" idiom. Something like 80% of the adult population goes along with Santa for Grownups because of peer pressure, also known as "mainstream religions". Don't get me started on partisan voting against one's own interests. Etc...

replies(6): >>45409758 #>>45409935 #>>45410069 #>>45410142 #>>45410476 #>>45411968 #
jmogly ◴[] No.45409758[source]
I think dismissing social realities as not being part of that hard, unyielding reality is a mistake. Part of intelligence (maybe a different part) is being able to bend the social fabric to achieve desirable outcomes. The other thing is you don’t always know why people do what they do, the world is a very subjective place. The people at work who don’t call things out, they might just be collecting a paycheck and are happy to not call things out. The poor conservative from Florida, they might actually hate immigrants more than they care about quality healthcare.
replies(2): >>45409902 #>>45409940 #
1. wslh ◴[] No.45409940[source]
My two cents: what you describe mainly applies on the micro level: advancement within peer groups. But if you step back and look at the macro level, accounting for biases, you can sometimes make giant leaps.