←back to thread

532 points tempaccount420 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Zambyte ◴[] No.45396281[source]
I was skeptical of the claim that it's faster than traditional SSH, but the README specifies that it is faster at establishing a connection, and that active connections are the same speed. That makes a lot of sense and seems like a reasonable claim to make.
replies(9): >>45396495 #>>45396529 #>>45396639 #>>45396881 #>>45400344 #>>45400909 #>>45400915 #>>45403285 #>>45410927 #
s-macke ◴[] No.45396881[source]
It is not faster in this sense. However, an SSH connection can have multiple substreams, especially for port forwarding. Over a single classical connection, this can lead to head-of-line blocking, where an issue in one stream slows everything down. QUIC/HTTP3 protocol can solve this.
replies(2): >>45398048 #>>45401658 #
inetknght ◴[] No.45401658[source]
Fun fact: SSH also supports multiple streams. It's called multiplexing.
replies(3): >>45401898 #>>45402432 #>>45403658 #
1. ◴[] No.45403658[source]