←back to thread

532 points tempaccount420 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.005s | source
Show context
Zambyte ◴[] No.45396281[source]
I was skeptical of the claim that it's faster than traditional SSH, but the README specifies that it is faster at establishing a connection, and that active connections are the same speed. That makes a lot of sense and seems like a reasonable claim to make.
replies(9): >>45396495 #>>45396529 #>>45396639 #>>45396881 #>>45400344 #>>45400909 #>>45400915 #>>45403285 #>>45410927 #
1. zielmicha ◴[] No.45403285[source]
SSH is actually really slow on high latency high bandwidth links (this is what HPN-SSH patches fix: https://www.psc.edu/hpn-ssh-home/hpn-ssh-faq). It's very apparent if you try running rsync between two datacenters on different contients.

HTTP/3 (and hopefully this project) does not have this problem.

replies(1): >>45404277 #
2. Aachen ◴[] No.45404277[source]
Sounds like a complex change to fix a security protocol but, reading the page, it seems to just increase the send buffer, which indeed makes sense for high-latency links