←back to thread

532 points tempaccount420 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.242s | source
Show context
Zambyte ◴[] No.45396281[source]
I was skeptical of the claim that it's faster than traditional SSH, but the README specifies that it is faster at establishing a connection, and that active connections are the same speed. That makes a lot of sense and seems like a reasonable claim to make.
replies(9): >>45396495 #>>45396529 #>>45396639 #>>45396881 #>>45400344 #>>45400909 #>>45400915 #>>45403285 #>>45410927 #
malux85 ◴[] No.45400909[source]
I read this and thought “who cares”?

I use ssh everywhere, maybe establish 200+ SSH sessions a day for my entire career of 20 years and never once have I thought “I wish establishing this connection was faster”

replies(1): >>45401229 #
1. efitz ◴[] No.45401229[source]
Good for you.

There are a lot of automation use cases for SSH where connection setup time is a significant impediment; if you’re making dozens or hundreds of connections to hundreds or thousands of hosts, those seconds add up.