←back to thread

532 points tempaccount420 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.404s | source
Show context
psanford ◴[] No.45396774[source]
I do hate the name ssh3. I was glad to see this at the top of the repo:

> SSH3 is probably going to change its name. It is still the SSH Connection Protocol (RFC4254) running on top of HTTP/3 Extended connect, but the required changes are heavy and too distant from the philosophy of popular SSH implementations to be considered for integration. The specification draft has already been renamed ("Remote Terminals over HTTP/3"), but we need some time to come up with a nice permanent name.

replies(28): >>45396871 #>>45397296 #>>45397372 #>>45397399 #>>45397495 #>>45397597 #>>45397619 #>>45397679 #>>45397940 #>>45398115 #>>45398136 #>>45398508 #>>45398532 #>>45398631 #>>45398858 #>>45398975 #>>45399238 #>>45399719 #>>45399778 #>>45400311 #>>45400334 #>>45400419 #>>45400814 #>>45400881 #>>45401030 #>>45401354 #>>45404259 #>>45415504 #
1. nine_k ◴[] No.45400334[source]
/* This is one proper bikeshedding thread if I ever saw one. */
replies(1): >>45400889 #
2. dpflan ◴[] No.45400889[source]
sshhh ... don't sidetrack the productive comment generation. (also, SSHHH as a possible name)...