←back to thread

355 points pavel_lishin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
dayvid ◴[] No.45388961[source]
Worth watching Modern MBA on the inefficiencies of transit in USA. Detailed analysis and comparison against Asian, European and Latin American systems along with private and government run operations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQ3LSNXwZ2Y
replies(3): >>45389122 #>>45389472 #>>45389779 #
rootusrootus ◴[] No.45389472[source]
Repeating the oft-cited but questionable assertion that car companies dismantled city rail systems makes me uncertain about how trustworthy the rest of their claims are. Though they did mention that the US is the most wealthy nation in the world -- did they later offer an opinion whether that would still be true had we approached public transit and health care subsidies the same way European countries did?
replies(2): >>45389790 #>>45395464 #
1. zbentley ◴[] No.45395464[source]
> whether that would still be true had we approached public transit and health care subsidies the same way European countries did?

Why wouldn’t it? I’ve heard many different explanations for the US’s wealth, but never that it’s wealthy because it saves on expenditures. There is also a solid case to be made that healthcare specifically would, if socialized, drive up productivity, earning power, and reduce fiscal risk (and risk aversion) for many demographics, all of which are good for GDP and other measures of a country’s wealth.

As for mass transit? It has costs and benefits too, but they’re a drop in the bucket compared to healthcare costs.