←back to thread

525 points alex77456 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
a022311 ◴[] No.45389492[source]
The same thing is happening in Greece. The new mandatory digital ID replaces and unifies everything about citizens in one place, "to make it easier for government services to share information between each other". It can indeed be useful, but the privacy implications are enormous. Just imagine that a policeman, employer or anybody else with access to the information linked to the ID can instantly view our medical records, tax status and even simpler things like if we've ever been caught driving while drunk. Nobody knows what other information could be attached to it, but it's certain that it can be used to discriminate against us.

The worst part is that we no longer have any power to do something about it. Eventually, after it goes through the testing phase in the UK and Greece (and a few other countries where it's being implemented), this will probably roll out on a global scale, making privacy impossibly. I'm starting to get this feeling that in the next decade, we'll be living in 1984...

replies(5): >>45389607 #>>45389666 #>>45389955 #>>45390207 #>>45391051 #
logicchains ◴[] No.45389666[source]
>The worst part is that we no longer have any power to do something about it.

That's not true. If a large enough mob of citizens went to the capital, burned down the government building and harassed MPs on the street (and followed them to their homes), as recently happened in Nepal and before that in Bangladesh, things would change very quickly.

replies(3): >>45389750 #>>45390637 #>>45393763 #
1. octo888 ◴[] No.45393763[source]
In the UK, if this comment could be traced to your ID/address, you'd be arrested likely on terrorism charges.
replies(1): >>45394232 #
2. logicchains ◴[] No.45394232[source]
Not if I was a Labor supporter: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/aug/15/suspended-l...
replies(1): >>45397937 #
3. foldr ◴[] No.45397937[source]
He was acquitted by a jury. Do you think Keir Starmer is bribing juries when the defendant is a Labour supporter or something? I'm sorry if that sounds flippant, but what exactly is your assumption about the underlying mechanism here? If there were some sort of Labour cabal controlling the justice system then this person would never have been arrested and tried in the first place.