←back to thread

525 points alex77456 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.724s | source
Show context
a022311 ◴[] No.45389492[source]
The same thing is happening in Greece. The new mandatory digital ID replaces and unifies everything about citizens in one place, "to make it easier for government services to share information between each other". It can indeed be useful, but the privacy implications are enormous. Just imagine that a policeman, employer or anybody else with access to the information linked to the ID can instantly view our medical records, tax status and even simpler things like if we've ever been caught driving while drunk. Nobody knows what other information could be attached to it, but it's certain that it can be used to discriminate against us.

The worst part is that we no longer have any power to do something about it. Eventually, after it goes through the testing phase in the UK and Greece (and a few other countries where it's being implemented), this will probably roll out on a global scale, making privacy impossibly. I'm starting to get this feeling that in the next decade, we'll be living in 1984...

replies(5): >>45389607 #>>45389666 #>>45389955 #>>45390207 #>>45391051 #
NicuCalcea ◴[] No.45389955[source]
> Just imagine that a policeman, employer or anybody else with access to the information linked to the ID can instantly view our medical records, tax status and even simpler things like if we've ever been caught driving while drunk

Why would I imagine that? There are privacy implications, but a unique ID doesn't mean everyone has access to all your data at any time for any reason.

replies(2): >>45390017 #>>45390946 #
array_key_first ◴[] No.45390017[source]
All it takes is one breach or vulnerability and then yes, they DO have access to all your data.

Imagine someone steals your driver's license. No biggie.

Now imagine they steal your identity which is linked to everything you ever do.

replies(2): >>45390349 #>>45390796 #
jama211 ◴[] No.45390349[source]
But that’s already the case without a digital id. It’s not like those accounts aren’t already linked together.
replies(2): >>45390921 #>>45391124 #
1. hereme888 ◴[] No.45390921[source]
Breach = data for all citizens.

Card = one person, limited use.

But most importantly: a Hitler rises to power = opposition is screwed.

replies(1): >>45393238 #
2. pezezin ◴[] No.45393238[source]
Ah, good old Godwin's law...

If a Hitler rises to power you will be screwed with or without an ID card, so please don't use such a silly argument.

replies(2): >>45394002 #>>45408660 #
3. protocolture ◴[] No.45394002[source]
Doesnt have to be a Hitler, imagining the worst case scenario for laws is absolutely apt.

Consider the Australian Access and Assistance bill. Among other things, it permits ministers to issue TCN's verbally. As far as we know (theres no oversight) this hasnt been done. But its concerning that the government can verbally require a corporation to (open endedly) change app functionality.

It would be better if Jim Hitler, had to fight the existing democracy to erode our freedoms, rather than just having to ask a minister to make it so.

Its absolutely better to assume the worst case than the best.