←back to thread

355 points pavel_lishin | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.414s | source
Show context
isthispermanent ◴[] No.45388969[source]
So the authors basic argument is to offshore bus production. As if that doesn’t carry any negative side effects.

This is exactly what the majority of Americans voted against and exactly why the left can’t find its footing. Everyone is now fully aware that offshoring for a cheap sticker price comes with higher, harder to price costs elsewhere.

replies(10): >>45389053 #>>45389111 #>>45389120 #>>45389141 #>>45389163 #>>45389239 #>>45389382 #>>45389624 #>>45392483 #>>45394896 #
twoodfin ◴[] No.45389111[source]
The side effects of “Buy American” rules do not include a dynamic, competitive domestic bus manufacturing industry. Just the opposite.

If the Chinese want to subsidize our mass transit buildout, why not let them? Are busses really critical national security concerns?

If we needed the existing NA producers to build military busses it sounds like we’d be screwed!

replies(4): >>45389165 #>>45389178 #>>45389194 #>>45389344 #
jibe ◴[] No.45389178[source]
A literal bus factory may not be critical for national security, but the ability to manufacture a vehicle is. So the know-how, the supply lines, and the manufacturing facility are important. The ability to manufacture a fuel injector, a transmission, a windshield is going going to apply to a bus, a plane, a tank..
replies(3): >>45389299 #>>45389418 #>>45394147 #
1. bradleybuda ◴[] No.45389299[source]
If only there was an entire American city filled with people and companies who had this expertise. We could call it the "Motor City".
replies(2): >>45389403 #>>45389445 #
2. dgfitz ◴[] No.45389403[source]
You ignored "supply lines"

I encourage you to find a vehicle made in said city with zero parts sourced from China.

That is the point.

3. supportengineer ◴[] No.45389445[source]
Or “Fremont”