←back to thread

355 points pavel_lishin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
isthispermanent ◴[] No.45388969[source]
So the authors basic argument is to offshore bus production. As if that doesn’t carry any negative side effects.

This is exactly what the majority of Americans voted against and exactly why the left can’t find its footing. Everyone is now fully aware that offshoring for a cheap sticker price comes with higher, harder to price costs elsewhere.

replies(10): >>45389053 #>>45389111 #>>45389120 #>>45389141 #>>45389163 #>>45389239 #>>45389382 #>>45389624 #>>45392483 #>>45394896 #
1. TrainedMonkey ◴[] No.45389163[source]
> So the authors basic argument is to offshore bus production.

No, their recommendation are transit subsidies with strings attached aimed at driving domestic economies of scale. Of course, depending on how a model is defined, 100 offshore unit cap can absolutely be gamed by making a "custom" model for each city or year.

> Finally, they recommend that foreign bus manufacturers be allowed to sell up to 100 vehicles of a given model, at which point they would need to establish a US manufacturing facility to expand sales further.

> To reduce costs, the researchers suggest that the federal reimbursements for bus purchases be capped at the 25th percentile cost of similar vehicles