←back to thread

663 points duxup | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
eadmund ◴[] No.45359858[source]
> [Elimination of] Automatic Refunds for Cancellations

Does this mean when the passenger cancels or when the airline cancels? If it’s when the passenger chooses to cancel, this seems fine and fair: he paid for a flight; he chose not to take it. If it’s the latter, then it seems very unfair.

> Transparency of Fees

This seems patently unfair. Folks should know what they’re going to be paying ahead of time.

> Family Seating Guarantees

On the one hand, this seems fair. If you want to sit together, pay for that privilege. It doesn’t make sense to tax every other passenger for it. OTOH, families are a net benefit to society, so maybe it’s right for everyone else to pitch in a bit. Also, nothing is worse than the folks who didn’t pay up ahead of time who bug one, ‘may we switch seats so we can sit together?’ So perhaps free family seating makes life easier for everyone.

> [Elimination of] Accessibility Protections for Disabled Passengers

I wonder what that actually means. It could be fair (for example, folks too large for one seat purchasing two) or unfair.

replies(18): >>45359959 #>>45359963 #>>45359981 #>>45359994 #>>45360024 #>>45360055 #>>45360094 #>>45360106 #>>45360155 #>>45360160 #>>45360223 #>>45360555 #>>45360614 #>>45360663 #>>45360939 #>>45360970 #>>45360997 #>>45361708 #
spartas ◴[] No.45360024[source]
> Also, nothing is worse than the folks who didn’t pay up ahead of time who bug one, ‘may we switch seats so we can sit together?’

Some of us parents ask that question for your benefit, not ours. Do you want to sit next to my three-year-old?

replies(4): >>45360213 #>>45360232 #>>45360290 #>>45360291 #
philipwhiuk ◴[] No.45360213[source]
Some of us think you're just being cheap.
replies(3): >>45360253 #>>45360912 #>>45363235 #
thieving_magpie ◴[] No.45360912[source]
Some of us are just trying to survive financially or couldn't care less what you think.

Tough luck then buddy. Have fun with the kids.

There has to be some kind of middle ground here, imo. Nobody wants to sit next to kids. Families don't want to be penalized financially anymore than they already are for providing a benefit to society. We don't need to further disincentivize families and further our declining birth rates. At the same time it's wildly unfair to ask people to switch seats when they've paid for them (or even if they haven't).

replies(1): >>45371395 #
philipwhiuk ◴[] No.45371395[source]
> Some of us are just trying to survive financially

You made choices, if you were informed about the costs that's kind of on you.

replies(1): >>45388300 #
1. thieving_magpie ◴[] No.45388300[source]
Then quit whining about the toddler next to ya. That's your choice too.

I don't understand the objection to a middle ground approach here, but if that's what we want then screw it.