I will not spend money on hardware no one can reliably patch or write drivers for. I also want other operating system maintainers to be able to write drivers and get booting.
I will not spend money on hardware no one can reliably patch or write drivers for. I also want other operating system maintainers to be able to write drivers and get booting.
With them only merging upstream now, it'll be a while before you can actually use Linux on these devices. You can build your own kernel from upstream, but it's probably a better idea to wait until Arch or Gentoo package the necessary pre-configured kernels.
From what I can tell, the Elite SoCs are a lot less outdated-semi-proprietary-Linux-fork-y than many other Qualcomm chips.
A better question: can a small company like Framework or even MNT Research build and support an open laptop around this chip?
As someone with a first gen, the device trees are, as I understand it, one of the issues with trying to just install any distro, except for that special Ubuntu one.
I can't just (for example) grab the latest fedora, and try and run that.
Now, I haven't tried the latest beta of Fedora 43, but my guess is this won't change.
ACPI enters the chat... It can send pieces of code interpreted by the kernel on any hardware event.
I have a Framework laptop and yeah the ACPI firmware is totally buggy and the Linux kernel fails at interpreting it in various cases.
The reality is this company is notoriously a law firm with a small technical staff on the side.