←back to thread

663 points duxup | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.635s | source
Show context
jmull ◴[] No.45362692[source]
Making flying even crappier doesn't seem like a good idea to me.

Regulations that put a floor on how crappy airlines can be should be pretty neutral on competition since all the airlines would have the same rules.

That's not to say all rules are a good idea, even rules that raise quality -- raising the floor raises prices, and if the floor is raised higher than necessary, prices are higher than necessary too, making flying less affordable. Set the floor too low and people fly less because it's too crappy. Set the floor too high and people fly less because it's too expensive. You're looking for the balance point.

IMO, the floor is too low right now. I think it's a mistake to try to lower it.

replies(6): >>45362771 #>>45365364 #>>45365378 #>>45365429 #>>45365447 #>>45366481 #
Ajedi32 ◴[] No.45365378[source]
> Set the floor too low and people fly less because it's too crappy.

Seems like a great opportunity for an airline to be less crappy and make a lot of money selling tickets to all those people who are "flying less" on other airlines, no?

So the question then becomes why hasn't someone done that already, if the floor really is "too low"?

replies(5): >>45365497 #>>45366043 #>>45366100 #>>45366155 #>>45366498 #
1. jmull ◴[] No.45366498[source]
> no?

No. Because people don't know how crappy it will be when they book.

They're just juggling prices and scheduled times.

People who aren't flying very frequently and don't have a trustworthy source of knowledgeable recommendations -- that is, a substantial majority of people -- will never take enough flights to know which airlines are worth $X more. If they even have many options for their route and time.

replies(1): >>45367857 #
2. bojangleslover ◴[] No.45367857[source]
Need to plug my Chrome Extension here, flyontime.app tries to help with this